← All case studies
Case study · 002 · Retail

IKEA

We mapped emotional and procedural friction in IKEA's online return journey — surfacing prioritized opportunities to reshape one of the most loyalty-defining moments in retail.

Client
IKEA
Industry
Retail · E-commerce
Engagement
3 months · Project-based
Services
UX Research · Service Insights
Role
Lead Researcher
I · The challenge

Returns are where loyalty either deepens — or quietly dies.

IKEA wanted to understand what was actually happening inside one of the most emotionally loaded moments of its customer experience: the online return journey. Conversion data could tell them where customers dropped off. It couldn't tell them why — or what those moments felt like.

The brief was deliberately explorative. No predetermined hypothesis. No specific feature to validate. Just an open question: where, in the online return process, are customers experiencing friction — and which of those moments matter most to fix?

"We can see the where in the data. What we can't see is the how-it-feels — and that's the part that decides whether a customer comes back."

— IKEA stakeholder, kick-off briefing
II · Our approach

Depth over breadth. Stories over screens.

Three months. One method as the spine: in-depth 1:1 interviews with people who had recently returned an IKEA product online.

01
In-depth 1:1 interviews
Phase 1 · 4 weeks

14 interviews with customers who had completed an online return in the past 60 days. Semi-structured, story-driven, focused on the moments of doubt and decision rather than the steps themselves.

02
Journey reconstruction
Phase 2 · 2 weeks

Mapped each customer's actual return journey — from the moment they decided to return through delivery confirmation. Highlighted emotional state, points of uncertainty, and the gaps between expectation and reality.

03
Friction-point clustering
Phase 3 · 2 weeks

Synthesised individual journeys into shared friction patterns — separating procedural friction (broken steps) from emotional friction (uncertainty, anxiety, lack of control).

04
Opportunity prioritization
Phase 4 · 2 weeks

Stakeholder workshop to map opportunities against impact and effort. Output: a prioritized backlog of intervention areas the IKEA team could move into design and roadmap planning.

"

The biggest friction wasn't doing the return. It was not knowing what would happen next.

— The pivotal insight, week 6
III · Deliverables

What IKEA walked away with.

An evidence base their product team could move on the same week — not a 60-page report.

01
14 interview transcripts + thematic analysis
Full transcripts, tagged by theme. Searchable for any future research question across the same journey.
02
Customer return journey map
End-to-end emotional + procedural map showing where customers feel anxious vs. where the system is technically failing.
03
Friction-point inventory
Every friction point identified, classified, and tied back to interview evidence.
04
Prioritized opportunity backlog
Opportunities ranked by impact vs. effort with the IKEA team — moved straight into roadmap planning.
05
Stakeholder workshop output
Aligned design, product, and CX leads on which opportunities to take into the next quarter — and which to park.
IV · Results

Three months. Real shifts.

14
in-depth interviews completed
23
friction points mapped to evidence
8
prioritized opportunity areas
12w
discovery → roadmap input
Next case study →
DUO
GovTech · UX research
Read case study →
Have a similar challenge?

If your team is sitting on a journey full of unknown emotional friction, we can help you map it.

Book a discovery call →